Version: 2.1: 12/17/04. Required hak for the world of Nailaeon. Contains Haelix - owlbear, giant ants -- Brent, goblin spider/worg riders -- Kinarr Greycloak and other surprises...
Posted by Greenlion420 at 2007-01-19 11:10:16 Voted 10.00 on 01/19/07
@Steel Wind.....blow me.
The Fold rocks and you just can't stand it. We did not design this site or how the votes work.
I live in So.Cal USA message me if you want to meet up & try to kick my arse....I dare ya.
Posted by Bane_Moonglum at 2004-03-29 18:20:00 Voted 10.00 on 02/20/04
I am indeed sorry about - and if it is possible I'll go and turn off the voting. We have no desire to be on this top hak listing, but don't twist the actions of people saying thanks as a guise that we are cheating.
We have no reason to cheat as you so say there steel wind on your comments - we put a compliation hak together and our members said thanks, unfortunately the end result is that it makes it up here - which shouldn't be here.
So should people, who are honestly saying mahalos, be condemned, or perhaps another category listing that doesn't possess a top listing as mentioned by Den be put into place.
I also find it a very tough comment that you call us cheaters as you did an interview w/ the PWC awhile back for us.The World Of Nailaeon -- the mists call... Link
Posted by Bane_Moonglum at 2004-03-29 18:07:00 Voted 10.00 on 02/20/04
I definetly agree that there should be another category for compliations.The World Of Nailaeon -- the mists call... Link
Posted by DraconisRex at 2004-03-29 14:57:00 Voted 1.00 on 03/29/04
I think it is absurd. I tried to e-mail Maximus to get PW haks with no new content out of the ratings.
We have DOA with his wonderful Builder's base. Danmar, and others, adding to it.
And they're behind someone's PW compilation hak...
Dude, take this off the vote.
Posted by DraconisRex at 2004-03-29 14:57:00 Voted 1.00 on 03/29/04
I think it is absurd. I tried to e-mail Maximus to get PW haks with no new content out of the ratings.
We have DOA with his wonderful Builder's base. Danmar, and others, adding to it.
And they're behind someone's PW compilation hak...
Dude, take this off the vote.
Posted by DraconisRex at 2004-03-29 14:55:11 Voted 1.00 on 03/29/04
Compliation Hak for a PW. No new material. Does not deserve any rating. Especially a 10.
Any chance we can get a separate category for module specific/PW haks, specifically as it relates to the Top Rated list? I don't think the good folks at TheFold intend to "stuff the ballot" as it were, but they are generating ill-will because their world haks have jumped to the top of the list.
Perhaps an easier solution would be to institute a minimum number of downloads for inclusion (about 300 should do it)? This would filter out most PW-related haks... just my 0.02pCarpe Terra, Project Lead
carpeterra.com
Posted by Steel_Wind at 2004-03-29 09:49:19 Voted 1.00 on 03/29/04
If these guys don't stop the blatant cheating, I am all for banning them from access to the Vault _________________________ .Robert
Project Lead, DLA Link
Posted by lockindal at 2004-03-29 09:35:40 Voted 4.00 on 03/29/04
Just another PW hak. :yawns:
Posted by aghar at 2004-03-28 23:24:40 Voted 9.00 on 03/28/04
Posted by Anthron at 2004-03-25 11:46:03 Voted 10.00 on 03/25/04
Posted by camlan at 2004-03-25 03:14:11 Voted 10.00 on 03/25/04
Giant ants are great to fight, maybe boars could have been lost somewhere.
Posted by Greenlion420 at 2004-03-24 15:55:52 Voted 10.00 on 01/19/07
Posted by Breach_in_Protocol at 2004-03-24 15:41:43 Voted 10.00 on 03/24/04
Posted by Locke_Murdock at 2004-03-24 07:57:28 Voted 10.00 on 03/24/04
Posted by Civious at 2004-03-24 04:45:11 Voted 10.00 on 03/24/04
Posted by phalplx at 2004-03-22 10:11:08 Voted 10.00 on 03/22/04
Posted by Nerangdoor at 2004-03-15 10:08:22 Voted 10.00 on 03/15/04
Posted by Bane_Moonglum at 2004-02-20 10:35:22 Voted 10.00 on 02/20/04
Overall: 10 Usefulness: 10 Value for Size 10 Ease of Use 10 Quality Control 10
You must be Logged In to post comments in this section.
Site
at 2004-03-29 12:17:00
at 2004-03-29 09:49:19
at 2004-03-29 09:35:40
at 2004-03-24 04:45:11
